Consumer rights and solidary responsibility in improper refusal of coverage in emergency parties analysis of Special Appeal nº 1.947.757-RJ

Main Article Content

Iuan Munhoz Linhares
Juliana Mota Batista
Lidiane Nascimento Leão

Abstract

The present research focuses on the joint liability between health plan operators and affiliated hospitals in cases of undue denial of coverage for emergency childbirth, based on the Consumer Defense Code and the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice. Its purpose is to determine whether, based on the Consumer Defense Code and the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice, it is possible to establish the joint liability of health plan operators and affiliated hospitals in cases of undue denial of coverage for emergency childbirth. Objectives: The general objective is to analyze this joint liability, based on the CDC and the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice. Specifically, the study aims to: identify the principles and norms of the CDC that support this liability; investigate the jurisprudence on health plan contracts in emergency cases; and examine the specific understanding of the same higher court in Special Appeal No. 1.947.757 - RJ. Method: The methodology adopted is qualitative, involving bibliographic review, documentary, and jurisprudential analysis, focused on the study of the aforementioned appeal. Results: The results indicate that the denial of coverage for emergency childbirth violates the right to health, justifying the application of joint liability, allowing the consumer to seek compensation from any party involved in the service delivery chain. Additionally, the study considers the relevance of integrating health law norms into the consumer code to maximize protection for consumers, especially in vulnerable situations such as pregnancy complications. Conclusion: It is concluded that a robust interpretation of the Consumer Defense Code, combined with the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice, is essential to ensure the legal protection of pregnant women, reinforcing the importance of an integrated approach between consumer law and health law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Artigos

Author Biographies

Iuan Munhoz Linhares, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará

Undergraduate in Law. Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA). Member of the research and extension project “Women's Rights and Obstetric Violence – Born in Santarém”, carried out at the Human Rights Clinic of the Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA).

Juliana Mota Batista, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará

Undergraduate in Law. Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA). Member of the research and extension project “Women's Rights and Obstetric Violence – Born in Santarém”, carried out at the Human Rights Clinic of the Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA).

Lidiane Nascimento Leão, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará

PhD in Law from the University of São Paulo (USP). Associate Professor at the Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA). Lawyer. Coordinator of the Human Rights Clinic at the Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA).

How to Cite

LINHARES, Iuan Munhoz; BATISTA, Juliana Mota; LEÃO, Lidiane Nascimento. Consumer rights and solidary responsibility in improper refusal of coverage in emergency parties: analysis of Special Appeal nº 1.947.757-RJ. Unisanta Law and Social Science, Santos, v. 13, n. 2, p. 169–183, 2024. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14262504. Disponível em: https://periodicosunisanta.ojsbr.com/LSS/article/view/2499. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2026.